Friday, June 19, 2026

America at War Abroad: Every U.S. War Won and Lost, 1798–2026


 Military History · United States

America at War Abroad

Every major U.S. war and military intervention fought beyond American soil, sorted by strategic outcome. Stalemates and ambiguous endings are counted as losses.

19
Conflicts abroad
12
Won
7
Lost & drawn
63%
Win rate
Each square is one conflict
WON
LOST OR DRAWN
2001 · The turning point

The unipolar moment begins to close.

Within months of 9/11, the United States walked away from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and China was admitted to the World Trade Organization. Together these marked the end of unchallenged American dominance — and every war the United States has entered since has ended in defeat or stalemate.

3 of 7
losses came after 9/11
100%
of post-9/11 wars lost or drawn

Thursday, June 18, 2026

The Mirror Facing the Mirror


The Mirror Facing the Mirror — On the Neverending Present and the Death of Historical Consciousness
Essay  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

The Mirror Facing the Mirror

On the neverending present, the death of historical consciousness, and what Justin Bieber pulling up YouTube at Coachella has in common with veterans of twenty years of war who feel their wars never happened.

Michele Rovatti  ·  June 2026

At his 2026 Coachella headlining set, Justin Bieber performed some of his older hits by pulling them up on a laptop via YouTube. Not by playing them. Not by performing them live. By finding the videos — the existing recordings, the already-produced content — and playing them to the audience as part of the show. A concert in which the performance of previous performances replaces performance. A video of a video, played to a crowd who filmed it on their phones to post as a video. The mirror facing the mirror, the reflections receding into a vanishing point, no original anywhere in the sequence.

It would be easy to dismiss this as a curiosity, an artist in uncertain health taking the path of least resistance at a high-stakes event. But the gesture is too precise to be accidental, and its precision reveals something about the era we are in that a more conventional concert would have hidden. What Bieber did at Coachella is what the content economy does to everything: it replaces the live event with the circulation of previous events. It substitutes presence with reference. It converts the unrepeatable moment into a loop of already-existing material. The neverending present does not generate new events. It recycles the ones it already has.

§

The content economy did not cause this condition. But it has perfected it. The feed is the technological form of the perpetual present: an endless horizontal scroll in which everything — the urgent and the trivial, the immediate and the archival, the live and the already-dead — appears in the same format, at the same size, demanding the same unit of attention. In the feed, there is no before and after. There is only the continuous present tense of the scroll. Nothing crystallizes into history because nothing has the time or the space to sediment. The event arrives, is consumed, and is replaced by more events. The sequence leaves no residue.

In the feed, there is no before and after. There is only the continuous present tense of the scroll. Nothing crystallizes into history because nothing has the time or the space to sediment.

The Bieber Coachella moment is the content economy making its logic visible at the level of live performance. The concert was always the form of cultural event that most directly confronted the feed's logic: something that happened once, in a specific place, with a specific crowd, and could not be replicated. The concert produced historicity by definition — it was an event, and an event is something that happened and then stopped happening, sealing itself in time and becoming available only as memory or recording. What Bieber did was eliminate the event. He produced a concert that was already its own archive, that consumed its own occasion, that replaced the live moment with the already-existing document of previous moments. He produced a feed on stage.

§

The inability to produce historical consciousness does not stop at culture. It has reached the most extreme possible test case: war.

The United States fought in Afghanistan for twenty years — 2001 to 2021. The longest war in American history. Over 2,400 American military deaths, hundreds of thousands of Afghan civilian deaths, trillions of dollars of expenditure, a generation of soldiers and intelligence officers who gave a decade or more of their lives to a conflict that ended with the Taliban in power and the Kabul airport as the last image. Iraq was different in its particulars and identical in its structural fate: a war of enormous human and financial cost that has produced almost no lasting cultural crystallization, no canonical works of art or literature, no iconic imagery that has entered the collective imagination with the force that Vietnam's imagery did, no music that has become inseparable from the era in the way that the music of the Vietnam years is inseparable from that war.

On a recent episode of The Team House podcast — hosted by Jack Murphy — Taamir Ransome, a Delta Force EOD operator who was blown up forty times across deployments to Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria, said something that should stop anyone who hears it. He described what veterans of the post-9/11 wars want from their country: recognition that these wars took place, that they happened. Not gratitude, not parades, not monuments. The minimum: acknowledgment of the fact. Murphy responded, laughing: we didn't go to war.

The laughter was not cynicism. It was the recognition of an absurdity so complete it had become almost comic. Twenty years of war, and the operative cultural fact for most of the country is that it didn't happen. Not because the wars were hidden — they were covered daily, documented obsessively, generated hundreds of thousands of hours of footage and reporting. But because the content economy processed them as content rather than as history. The wars arrived in the feed, were consumed as breaking news and then as background noise, and were replaced by more content. They left no residue. They produced no historicity. They happened in the perpetual present and vanished into it.

§

Compare this to the cultural crystallization that previous wars produced. Vietnam generated Apocalypse Now, Full Metal Jacket, The Deer Hunter, Born on the Fourth of July, Platoon — films that made the war inescapable as a cultural fact, that forced the country into a reckoning with what had happened and what it meant, that sealed the war in collective memory as something that could not be unfelt. It generated a musical culture — Creedence Clearwater Revival, Hendrix, Dylan, the whole counter-cultural explosion — that became inseparable from the era. It generated a political consciousness that shaped American culture for a generation. The war became history because the culture processed it as history: slowly, with the full weight of artistic attention, with the willingness to be changed by an encounter with something that could not be reduced to content.

The post-9/11 wars generated The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty — two technically accomplished films that were absorbed into the award season cycle and promptly forgotten. They generated no music that anyone associates with the era. They generated memoirs and journalism of considerable quality that were read by small audiences and did not enter the broader culture. They generated twenty years of daily news coverage that is now effectively inaccessible because it was never archived in a form that cultural memory could use — it was just feed, disappearing as it arrived.

The soldiers who fought them are left asking for the minimum: recognition that the wars took place, that they were real, that they happened to real people and deserve to exist in collective memory. The laughter on the podcast is the sound of a civilization that has lost the capacity to make its own experiences historical — that processes even its wars as content, consuming them in real time and leaving no trace.

§

The mirror facing the mirror produces infinite reflection and no image. The reflections recede into a vanishing point and what remains is the frame — the screen, the feed, the endless scroll — but not the thing the frame was supposed to contain. Bieber at Coachella pulling up YouTube is the cultural symptom. The veterans of twenty years of war asking for recognition that their wars happened is the human cost. Both are expressions of the same structural condition: a civilization trapped in the perpetual present, processing everything as content, generating no history, leaving no residue.

For something to become history it needs time and cultural space — the slow metabolization that transforms an event into a symbol, a symbol into a reference point, a reference point into the shared vocabulary through which a society understands itself. The content economy eliminates time and cultural space. It converts everything into the present tense and the present tense into a feed. What Vietnam was processed by films made years after the fact, by music that took the war's emotional reality and gave it form over a decade, by a political consciousness that developed slowly in response to the accumulating evidence — none of this is possible in the content economy. By the time a culture could have metabolized the Afghanistan war, the feed had already replaced it with something else. And the soldiers who fought it are left with the absurdity Ransome names and Murphy laughs at: the countrywide recognition that these wars took place, that they did happen.

They happened. The content economy just forgot to notice.

This essay connects to Chapter Two (Culture Versus Content) and Chapter Five (The Mirror) of The Dream of Never: Culture, Capital, and the Refusal of Limits. Available on Amazon Kindle.

Related essays:  The Ibiza Case  ·  The River Does Not Have Preferences  ·  The Flood the Platform Built  ·  Why Autocracies Won

michelerovatti.com  ·  Writing since 2012

Saturday, May 30, 2026

The Prancing Horse and the iPhone Designer

Essay  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

The Prancing Horse and the iPhone Designer

On Ferrari, the Luce, and how to destroy a brand in one presentation.

Michele Rovatti  ·  May 2026

There is a particular kind of corporate failure that only happens to great brands. Not the failure of incompetence — any company can fail through incompetence. This is the failure of people who are too clever, too connected, too convinced of their own vision to notice that they are dismantling the thing they were entrusted to protect.

Ferrari had that failure on May 25th, 2026, in Rome.

Il Cavallino e il Designer dell'iPhone

Saggio  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

Il Cavallino e il Designer dell'iPhone

Su Ferrari, la Luce, e come distruggere un marchio in una sola presentazione.

Michele Rovatti  ·  Maggio 2026

Esiste un particolare tipo di fallimento aziendale che accade soltanto ai grandi marchi. Non il fallimento dell'incompetenza — qualsiasi azienda può fallire per incompetenza. Questo è il fallimento di persone troppo intelligenti, troppo connesse, troppo convinte della propria visione per accorgersi che stanno smantellando ciò che erano state incaricate di proteggere.

Ferrari ha avuto quel fallimento il 25 maggio 2026, a Roma.

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Why Autocracies Won

Essay  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

Why Autocracies Won

We tried to change them, they are changing us.

Michele Rovatti  ·  May 2026

In September 2019, Boris Johnson prorogued the British Parliament. Five weeks of parliamentary session, suspended by executive decree, justified by the constitutional convention that governments may seek a prorogation at any point. The Supreme Court ruled the action unlawful in a unanimous judgment — eleven judges, zero dissents. The Prime Minister had attempted to bypass the legislature because the legislature was in his way. The courts stopped him. The system, on that occasion, worked.

Saturday, May 23, 2026

The River Does Not Have Preferences - An Analogy on the Logic of Capital

Essay  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

The River Does Not Have Preferences

In December 2025, Xi Jinping brought Emmanuel Macron to a two-thousand-three-hundred-year-old irrigation system in Sichuan province. He was not offering a lesson in hydraulic engineering.

Michele Rovatti  ·  May 2026

The Dujiangyan irrigation system was built around 256 BC by Li Bing, governor of Shu under the Qin dynasty. It is the oldest functioning irrigation infrastructure in the world — continuously operational for over two thousand three hundred years. It works by cutting a channel through a mountain to divide the Min River into an inner channel for irrigation and an outer channel for flood control. No dam. Not blockage but division. Not opposition but redirection. The river's own force is the instrument of its management. It is a UNESCO World Heritage site. It still irrigates the Chengdu Plain today.

Sunday, May 17, 2026

The Fear of Ideas - Democracy, Cultural Hegemony, and the Politics of Thought

The Fear of Ideas

The controversy surrounding the Italian government’s proposed revision of secondary school philosophy guidelines is not merely academic. It reveals a deeper anxiety about culture, ideology, and the fragility of democratic legitimacy in an age of political exhaustion.

Sunday, May 10, 2026

The Proportions Are Perfect for the Space — On Banksy, Westminster Council, and the End of Transgression

Addendum  /  The Bud That Never Blossomed  /  May 2026

The Proportions Are Perfect for the Space

On Banksy's Waterloo Place statue, Westminster City Council's warm welcome, and what it means when the institution congratulates the gesture that was supposed to unsettle it.

Michele Rovatti  ·  May 2026

This is an addendum to The Bud That Never Blossomed, which argued that the system no longer represses cultural threat — it absorbs it before it can mature. What follows is a case study, delivered by events ten days ago.

On the morning of 29 April 2026, Londoners walking through Waterloo Place found a new statue among the monuments to King Edward VII and the Crimean War dead. A suited man, holding a large flag. The flag blows back into his face, covering his eyes. He steps forward confidently off the edge of the plinth. He cannot see where he is going because the thing he is carrying for pride has blinded him. The base of the plinth bears a signature. Banksy had installed it overnight.

By the following morning the BBC had confirmed the attribution. Galleries went live. Commentators gathered. The piece was identified as a critique of blind patriotism — timed, the press noted, to coincide with King Charles III's state visit to Washington, where he addressed Congress in defence of NATO. The placement was observed to be pointed: Banksy's anti-establishment gesture installed among the monuments of British imperial and military history, the subversive work taking its place in the civic landscape of St James's.

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

The Ibiza Case - Politics, Spectacle, and the Management of Narrative

 

Essay  /  michelerovatti.com  /  2026

The Ibiza Case

On how a dictatorship accidentally created the conditions for one of the twentieth century's most fertile cultural experiments, and what the growth imperative did to it next.

Michele Rovatti  ·  May 2026

Pliny the Elder recorded the name in the first century AD. The Greeks had called them the Pityussae — islands of pines — for the forests that covered them. The pine trees and the gnarled juniper, the sabina, introduced by the Phoenicians and cultivated for its extraordinarily hard wood, were the first thing anyone noticed about the place. They are still there. Some of the junipers at Cala Bassa, on the island's west coast, are a hundred years old. They are classified as cultural heritage under Spanish law and cannot be touched. The beach club sets its Balinese beds in their shade.

The trees are the right place to start, because what happened to Ibiza is the story of a place whose aura — whose specific cultural gravity — was produced by conditions that had nothing to do with commerce, and then consumed by a commerce that could not have existed without them. The aura is now eroding. The trees are still there. The question is how long the trees can outlast what is being sold in their shade.

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

"Sleep Well, European Partners": Russia Just Named Your Factory as a War Target




On 15 April 2026, the Russian Ministry of Defence published a list of European facilities it considers legitimate military targets. Four of them are in Italy. Not a single European government has called an emergency session.


We are being led into war. Not with a declaration, not with a parliamentary vote, not even with an honest public debate.

On 15 April 2026, the Russian Ministry of Defence published — via its official Telegram channel — a list of European facilities it considers part of Ukraine's military infrastructure. Drone factories. Component suppliers. Real addresses. Real buildings. On EU soil.

Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council, followed immediately on X:

"The list must be taken literally: the publication of production sites for drones and other military equipment in Europe is a register of potential legitimate targets for the Russian armed forces. Sleep well, European partners."

This is not a threat buried in a diplomatic communiqué. It is a public register of targets, published by a nuclear power, naming factories in Poland, Germany, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Denmark, Lithuania, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom — and Italy.

And our governments said nothing....

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

The Bud That Never Blossomed (Culture · Theory · Digital Age)

Culture · Theory · Digital Age

The Bud That Never Blossomed

On the end of cultural novelty, the death of the avant-garde, and what the machine inherits from a landscape it didn’t kill — but completed.

Essay  /  2026

There is a feeling circulating among those who pay attention — not panic, not nostalgia exactly, but something closer to a quiet recognition. The feeling that something in culture has run its course. That the novelties of today are the platitudes of yesterday, repackaged with a new typeface and distributed at scale. That what we call innovation is mostly recombination, and that the avant-garde, across every field simultaneously, has gone silent.

This essay is an attempt to name that feeling precisely — and to ask whether it signals an ending, an interregnum, or something structurally new and irreversible.

“The past is never dead. It is not even past.”1 The commodity, however, makes sure it is recycled.

Thursday, April 9, 2026

"Wag the Dog" 2026: The Epstein Files, Melania Trump’s Desperate Statement, and the War That Changed Everything


"The most entertaining outcome is the most likely"


The timing is, at the very least, extraordinary. For months, the Trump administration has faced mounting pressure over its handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, with the Department of Justice accused of illegally withholding documents that allegedly contain sexual abuse allegations against the president. Then, in a single, staggering week, the entire news cycle was hijacked by the most dramatic event imaginable: a full-scale war with Iran. For many, the sequence no longer feels like a coincidence, but a chillingly familiar page from a dystopian screenplay.


The Epstein Scandal that Wouldn't Go Away

Thursday, March 12, 2026

The Scythe Cut and the Two Roads to Beijing: How America's Partisan War Plans Are Converging into a Pincer Against China



The opening months of 2026 have exposed a profound realignment in the global order. The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro on January 3 and the launch of Operation Epic Fury on February 28—culminating in the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and widespread strikes on Iranian nuclear, missile, and leadership targets—appear, at first glance, as separate operations aimed at regime change, counter-narcoterrorism, and nuclear prevention. Yet a growing body of strategic commentary points to an emerging, if opportunistic, grander design: a pincer movement designed to sever China's strategic lifelines and erode its network of partners.

This is not merely about Caracas or Tehran. It is increasingly about Beijing.

To grasp the architecture, recognize a longstanding pattern in U.S. foreign policy: two distinct partisan "roads" to containing China's rise, each rooted in ideology but sharing the same endpoint.